"Collateral damage" is a term for any incidental and undesired death, injury or other damage inflicted, especially on civilians, as the result of an activity. Originally coined to describe military operations, [1] it is now also used in non-military contexts to refer to negative unintended consequences of an action.

Collateral Damage: Directed by Andrew Davis. With Arnold Schwarzenegger, Francesca Neri, Elias Koteas, Cliff Curtis. After his family is killed by a terrorist act, a firefighter goes in search of the one responsible.

Jan 13, 2025 · The meaning of COLLATERAL DAMAGE is injury inflicted on something other than an intended target; specifically : civilian casualties of a military operation.

Collateral Damage is a 2002 American vigilante action-thriller film directed by Andrew Davis and starring Arnold Schwarzenegger, Elias Koteas, Francesca Neri, Cliff Curtis, John Leguizamo, and John Turturro.

COLLATERAL DAMAGE definition: 1. during a war, the unintentional deaths and injuries of people who are not soldiers, and damage…. Learn more.

COLLATERAL DAMAGE meaning: forms of damage including deaths and injuries that are a result of the fighting in a war but happen to people who are not in the military

When these unintended consequences translate into someone or something being damaged, they are known as “collateral damage”. Collateral damage can have a significant impact on us and others, both in the short and long term.

Jul 10, 2024 · Explore the critical "Collateral Damage Considerations" in warfare, examining ethical implications, legal frameworks, and strategies to mitigate civilian harm.

Dec 5, 2023 · Collateral damage, unintended harm during military operations, encompasses civilian casualties and property destruction. Governed by international law, its significance extends beyond the battlefield, influencing war ethics, global policy, and public perception.

Collateral damage refers to unintentional harm or destruction inflicted on non-combatants and civilian property during military operations. This concept raises significant ethical questions about the justifications for using force, particularly in war, where the distinction between combatants and non-combatants can become blurred.