Artwork generated by artificial intelligence must have a human contributor to earn copyright protection in the United States, ...

Current IP law dictates that “material generated wholly by AI is not copyrightable” and that of the 10,000 comments received ...

Does using AI make you less of an artist? The US Copyright Office has weighed in on the debate. Its ruling could reshape copyright law as we know it.

Marvel Studios faces backlash online after fans allegedly spot AI-generated hands in the new Fantastic Four poster.

Human-created works with AI elements, however, can still be copyrighted as a whole. Generative artificial intelligence output ...

The generative AI boom has raised complex, multibillion-dollar legal questions that courts across the country are in the ...

As we are and always have been a community award, the ENNIE Staff is currently considering putting the choice to a vote” ...

Artists can get some protection if they feed their own work into an AI system for modification — by, say, using a tool to add 3D effects to an illustration. AI-generated elements of the work ...

The US Copyright Office declares AI-generated work can't be protected by copyright, due to a lack of a human author.

Nicolas Cage has voiced deep concerns about the rise of generative AI in art and film making, warning that “robots cannot reflect the human condition.” ...

art, music, even software — clarified that some forms of AI generated content can, in fact, receive copyright protection, provided that a human substantially contributed or changed the content ...