It is significant to note that the complaint was lodged by the father of the claimant on 19.1.2007 whereas the claim petition was filed by the minor claimant represented through his mother, natural ...

Ahmednagar, in Motor Accident Claim Petition No. 22 Mr. K.D. Mote appearing for respondents no.01 and 02. He has proved the contents of the injury certificate. says that the said accident was caused ...

This is contrary to what has been stated in the FIR.

Therefore, this breach of condition of policy of insurance being "fundamental breach", the insurer of the offending vehicle, cannot be compelled to indemnify the Opponent No. 2. Therefore, "to pay and ...

1. This appeal is by the Insurance company challenging the Judgment and Order passed by the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, Chintamani, ['Tribunal', for short] in MVC No. 19/2007.

Citation: 2024:BHC-AS:20013,MANU/MH/2853/2024. 1. The issue involved in this appeal is pay and recovery order passed by the Tribunal and contributory negligence of the deceased.

15. The first contention, therefore, has no merit. 21. All contentions on merit, therefore, fail. Constitution to relieve him of the necessity to serve his prison term.

Citation: MANU/JH/0275/2022,2024(3) TAC 59 Jhar. 1. Claimant has preferred the appeal against the judgment of dismissal of claim application filed under section 92(A ...

R.K. Varma and G.G. Sohani, JJ. Author: R.K. Varma, J. Citation: MANU/MP/0225/1986, (1986)2ACC129. 1. This order shall also govern the disposal of Misc. Appeal No. 57 ...

Citation: MANU/MH/2654/2019. https://www.lawweb.in/2025/05/bombay-hc-how-to-appreciate-evidence-in.html 2) Bombay HC: How to appreciate evidence in motor accident ...