It is significant to note that the complaint was lodged by the father of the claimant on 19.1.2007 whereas the claim petition was filed by the minor claimant represented through his mother, natural ...

This is contrary to what has been stated in the FIR.

Therefore, this breach of condition of policy of insurance being "fundamental breach", the insurer of the offending vehicle, cannot be compelled to indemnify the Opponent No. 2. Therefore, "to pay and ...

1. This appeal is by the Insurance company challenging the Judgment and Order passed by the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, Chintamani, ['Tribunal', for short] in MVC No. 19/2007.

Citation: 2024:BHC-AS:20013,MANU/MH/2853/2024. 1. The issue involved in this appeal is pay and recovery order passed by the Tribunal and contributory negligence of the deceased.

15. The first contention, therefore, has no merit. 21. All contentions on merit, therefore, fail. Constitution to relieve him of the necessity to serve his prison term.

Citation: MANU/MH/2654/2019. https://www.lawweb.in/2025/05/bombay-hc-how-to-appreciate-evidence-in.html 2) Bombay HC: How to appreciate evidence in motor accident ...

The burden of proof is on the claimants. Same may be discharged on preponderance of probabilities. The insurer may lead independent evidence in disproof of the claim or it may point out that the ...

Second witness of the claimant is Balasaheb Bongane CW-3. He states that he was proceeding on his motorcycle and witnessed the offending jeep dashed against motor cycle of the deceased Dattarao. He ...